*1:4 τουτων rell ¦ ταυτης [10%]
†1:4 εν f35 ℵ048v [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 τη A,B,Cv [3%] NU
‡1:5 εις τους f35 (90.1%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP [2 (1.9%)] ¦ τουτο ℵA,B,C,048 (7.4%) NU ¦ two other variants (0.6%) (Is the reading of the eclectic text not inferior?)
§1:7 ονοματος rell ¦ 1 αυτου [15%] (AV’s TR)
*1:7 εθνων f35 (88.3%) RP,HF,TR,CP ¦ εθνικων ℵA,B(C)048 (11.7%) OC,NU
†1:8 απολαμβανειν f35 (91.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ υπολαμβανειν ℵA,B,C,048 (7.2%) NU ¦ λαμβανειν (0.6%) ¦ two other variants (0.4%)
‡1:8 γινωμεθα rell ¦ γενωμεθα 048 [30%] CP ¦ γινομεθα C [3%]
§1:9 εγραψα f35 C [88%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 τι ℵA(B) [2%] NU ¦ 1 αν 048 [10%]
*1:10 υπομνησω rell ¦ υπομνησων CP
†1:10 εκ rell ¦ — ℵ048 [20%]
‡1:11 δε f35 [25%] TR ¦ — ℵA,B,C,048 [75%] RP,HF,OC,CP,NU (Would not John, a Jew, be more likely to write the conjunction?)
§1:12 ὑπ f35 A,B,048 [99%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ υπο ℵC [1%] NU
*1:12 οιδαμεν f35 (23%) CP ¦ οιδατε (61.5%) RP,HF,OC,TR ¦ οιδας ℵA,B,C,048 (15.1%) NU ¦ οιδα (0.4%) (Soden mentions Kr once in 2 John but not at all in 3 John, when he definitely should have. In 3 John 12 TuT lists ALL 78 basic f35 MSS (±0 to ±3) for οιδαμεν, but Soden does not mention Kr in support of this variant. Since he doesn’t mention Kr anywhere in 3 John, we should not trust his silence. The first person was unexpected and was changed to the expected second person—in the context I would say that the singular is a ‘better’ correction than the plural.)
†1:13 γραφειν f35 [85%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ γραψαι σοι ℵA,B,C(048v) [11%] NU ¦ 1 σοι [4%]
‡1:13 σοι γραψαι f35 [85%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 γραφειν ℵB,C [3%] NU ¦ ~ γραφειν 1 A,048 [8%] ¦ ~ 21 [4%]
§1:14 ιδειν σε f35 ℵ (95%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 21 A,B,C,048 (4.8%) NU ¦ 1 (0.2%)
*1:14 λαλησομεν rell ¦ λαλησωμεν [20%] ¦ λαλησαι [1%] ¦ λαλησαι σοι [2%]
†1:15 ονομα rell ¦ 1 αμην [13%] CP [See the last footnote in Jude.]